EMPLOYING THE CRITICAL JUNCTURE HYPOTHESIS TO EXPLAINTHE 2011 EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION

Search in the repository



Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author MUSSA, R.
dc.contributor.author YESBERGEN, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-15T11:19:07Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-15T11:19:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021-01-04
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.apa.kz/xmlui/handle/123456789/912
dc.description.abstract Our research question involves applying the critical juncture hypothesis formulated by Daron Acemoglu andhis co-authors in the series of the articles and books to the context of the 2011 Arab Spring events. Critical juncturehypothesis states that politics and political institutions determine what economic institutions a country has, because theformer represents the distribution of political power. Whoever controls political institutions then can set up economicinstitutions, determining the rules governing economic activities and who will benefit from them. Generated resourcesare then used in defending these sets of institutions. Though for Acemoglu and his co-authors politics always precedeseconomics, it is the interplay of political and economic institutions that explain contemporary development of states.The case of 2011 Egyptian Revolution is presented, as the well-documented illustraion of the hypothesis at work. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Мемлекеттік басқару және мемлекеттік қызмет en_US
dc.subject comparative democratization en_US
dc.subject political economy en_US
dc.subject economic growth en_US
dc.subject Arab Spring en_US
dc.title EMPLOYING THE CRITICAL JUNCTURE HYPOTHESIS TO EXPLAINTHE 2011 EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record