Search in the repository
Show simple item record
eperson.phone |
mergend7@gmail.com |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dyussenov, M. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-04-21T11:27:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-04-21T11:27:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-5 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2315-7844 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.apa.kz/xmlui/handle/123456789/49 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The focusing event theory has been substantially formed by contributions of John Kingdon by offering a somewhat broader definition of focusing events through the prism of his multiple streams theory, and Thomas Birkland, who introduced better precision by listing a number of basic characteristics of focusing events (eg using the example of 9/11 terrorist attacks as a focusing event, as in Birkland 2004). These major contributions notwithstanding, there still seems to be a strikingly persistent absence of clarity in defining the notion of" focusing events" within the agenda-setting stage of the policy process, and a lack of a general typology of related significant, or key events. Even somewhat more disturbing is that, inspired by Birkland’s notion of focusing events, a number of subsequent scholars attempted to develop this theory, unintentionally further conflating the meaning of focusing events. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Review of Public Administration and Management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Agenda-Setting |
en_US |
dc.subject |
New Typology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Anchor’Events |
en_US |
dc.title |
Contrasting between Focusing, Real-World and Significant Events in Agenda-Setting: Introducing a New Typology of ‘Anchor’Events |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show simple item record