Corruption in international investment arbitration

Search in the repository



Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Aronov, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-15T09:17:45Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-15T09:17:45Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01
dc.identifier.issn 2616-6844
dc.identifier.issn 2663-1318
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.apa.kz/xmlui/handle/123456789/170
dc.description.abstract Corruption appears to be destructive to investment arbitration and the international development as a whole. In some states to engage in corruption is a typical method of conducting business in investment or trade. There are two forms of bribery regarding international investment. One of them is that when an investor corrupts public official to get a suitable investment agreement, another is where the investor is blackmailed to pay money by a person who has authority. The paper aims to evaluate whether international investment arbitration as a source of dispute settlement might be used to combat bribery in foreign investment. Also, the paper focuses on a controversial issue when host states may use corruption as a defence in investment tribunals. As an example, a case the World Duty Company Ltd v Republic of Kenya has been given to explain the defence by the host state. One may expect that this case is able to change approach taken by previous arbitrators. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің ХАБАРШЫСЫ en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ҚҰҚЫҚ;
dc.subject Corruption en_US
dc.subject investment arbitration en_US
dc.subject investor en_US
dc.subject host state en_US
dc.subject ribunal en_US
dc.subject English law en_US
dc.subject anticorruption policy en_US
dc.title Corruption in international investment arbitration en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record